Comments on: New Nikon Full-Frame DSLR?

By: Rex

Rex — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:59:52 +0000

Well, I hope it’s larger than 12ish megapixels. I can’t believe the super-expensive D3 is only 12.1 MP. Love the features I’ve read on it, but figured it’d be bigger to compete with the Canon D1s Mark III.

By: ikepix

ikepix — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:54:23 +0000

Please don’t play with my weak heart. I almost have the cash for the D3, and now this? The Nikon gods are a cruel lot.

By: rygood

rygood — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:58:44 +0000

@AJ – To that I’d really say look at the success of the Canon 5D. I would venture to guess that it has been much more profitable for Canon than the 1D series. As for the authenticity of the materials…who knows… the fakes have happened before, only time will tell.

By: Nikon D700 Full Frame DSLR » Kineda

Nikon D700 Full Frame DSLR » Kineda — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:03:34 +0000

[...] Camera Porn) Read Comments (0) » Related Posts on Kineda: Nikon D200 10.2MP [...]

By: New Nikon Full-Frame DSLR? at CameraPorn | The Click

New Nikon Full-Frame DSLR? at CameraPorn | The Click — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:48:56 +0000

[...] Check it out here. [...]

By: Dude

Dude — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:47:57 +0000

It makes sense that Nikon reuses much of it’s technology from the D300
(body, af) and the D3 (sensor ,af) in this rumored camera. Nikon is a
very small company compared to Canon.

By: A. J. Viggen

A. J. Viggen — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:18:50 +0000

I’d love it if these rumors were true, as such a camera would make a great complement to my D300 for wide-angle shooting… but it sounds SO much like the camera Nikon buffs have been fantasizing since the D3 appeared that I’m still skeptical.

All the ‘promotional material’ and ad copy in the pics could have been lifted from existing D3 and D300 promo materials; in fact, in several places the words “D700″ look, to my eye, just a bit straighter and cleaner than the surrounding text, as if someone had blotted out “D3″ or “D300″ and Photoshopped in the new text.

The real deal-killer: the specs and performance of the D300 are already very close to those of the D3 except for sensor size. If Nikon brought out an FX-sensor version of the same camera at a much lower price than the D3, wouldn’t they be shooting themselves in the foot with a really big gun?