<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L – So Good Your Other Lenses are Already Jealous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/</link>
	<description>Hot gear, down &#38; dirty reviews, and delicious photos</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: taltal</title>
		<link>http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-1527</link>
		<dc:creator>taltal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-1527</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a dream... but a heavy one! (950g...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a dream&#8230; but a heavy one! (950g&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Thoughts on Concert Photography at CameraPorn</title>
		<link>http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>More Thoughts on Concert Photography at CameraPorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-334</guid>
		<description>[...] this in mind, I will typically start out a show using my 24-70L f/2.8 lens opened up all the way to f/2.8, ISO 1600, and a shutter speed of 1/125th of a second. Depending on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this in mind, I will typically start out a show using my 24-70L f/2.8 lens opened up all the way to f/2.8, ISO 1600, and a shutter speed of 1/125th of a second. Depending on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Just a bit of trivia on the reverse zooming extension you mentioned above - it's so that you get good coverage from the lens hood at all focal lengths. At 24mm the end of the lens is extended towards the end of the hood, as you zoom out the end retracts and more of the hood is used to protect against flare. Pretty clever really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a bit of trivia on the reverse zooming extension you mentioned above - it&#8217;s so that you get good coverage from the lens hood at all focal lengths. At 24mm the end of the lens is extended towards the end of the hood, as you zoom out the end retracts and more of the hood is used to protect against flare. Pretty clever really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Photo Blogs - Today&#8217;s Top Blog Posts on Photography - Powered by SocialRank</title>
		<link>http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Photo Blogs - Today&#8217;s Top Blog Posts on Photography - Powered by SocialRank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-248</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L – So Good Your Other Lenses are Already Jealous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L – So Good Your Other Lenses are Already Jealous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-ville81</title>
		<link>http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>E-ville81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-235</guid>
		<description>What he said I just got mine last night and it is amazing that I own such a peice of perfection. I also was on the fence between the 24-105 and the 24-70 but once you handle it for the first time you realize you wasted alot of time trying to make a decision. I have the 40D and love the focal range. Don't think you have to have a 5D for this lens. You just have to have Money! Great review Very accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What he said I just got mine last night and it is amazing that I own such a peice of perfection. I also was on the fence between the 24-105 and the 24-70 but once you handle it for the first time you realize you wasted alot of time trying to make a decision. I have the 40D and love the focal range. Don&#8217;t think you have to have a 5D for this lens. You just have to have Money! Great review Very accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chl</title>
		<link>http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>chl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 03:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Yup, the "L" is what Canon uses to designate their "pro" line of lenses. They also all have that red stripe you see around the end of the barrel. They're typically heavier, as they use more glass than the standard lenses, and they are build sturdier.

Expensive, for sure, but once you get used to them it's really hard to go back. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, the &#8220;L&#8221; is what Canon uses to designate their &#8220;pro&#8221; line of lenses. They also all have that red stripe you see around the end of the barrel. They&#8217;re typically heavier, as they use more glass than the standard lenses, and they are build sturdier.</p>
<p>Expensive, for sure, but once you get used to them it&#8217;s really hard to go back. <img src='http://www.cameraporn.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeyJules</title>
		<link>http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>HeyJules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameraporn.net/2007/08/20/canon-24-70mm-f28l-%e2%80%93-so-good-your-other-lenses-are-already-jealous/#comment-207</guid>
		<description>I really value these reviews you do on the different lenses.  One thing I've been wondering about - I see you refer to this and a few others as "L" series.  How is that different than their other lenses?  Is it a "pro" level or special glass or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really value these reviews you do on the different lenses.  One thing I&#8217;ve been wondering about - I see you refer to this and a few others as &#8220;L&#8221; series.  How is that different than their other lenses?  Is it a &#8220;pro&#8221; level or special glass or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.096 seconds -->
